concept | proposal | evaluation plan

Your project proposal begins with a statement of concept that expresses a big picture sense of what you wish to accomplish and why. Next, a contribution and benefits statement positions the proposed work in its field and in society. These two can be connected to form the introduction. A prior work section addresses enumerates the basis of the project with needs, resources, and precedents. An evaluation plan says how we will know if the project is successful. A project plan says what will be done when by whom.

Also, briefly state what conference or journal you will submit to. Some possibile venues are listed here. If you have other ideas, please let me know.

A good idea for how to develop a proposal in practice is

  1. Write concept and contribution and benefits.
  2. Write development portion of project plan.
  3. Write evaluation plan, and evaluation portion of project plan.
  4. Now write the prior work section. Make sure it addresses how you will develop and evaluate.
  5. Write the abstract.

This deliverable (and all others in this final project cycle) must be submitted in the format most appropriate for the venue that you will publish in.

Statement of Concept [1/2 page]

So, what are you going to make? Why do you want to make it? What will it reflect? What is the project's function and social role? What processes (e.g., person, social, technological) are important. Why? Develop a 1/2 page statement of concept. In this section, make sure to convince the reader that project is innovative and beneficial. Make the contribution clear. Do this without using any language that sounds like a sales pitch!

Contribution and Benefits[1/2 page]

What good is your invention? What needs will it meet? What problems does it solve? Who will benefit? How? Why would anyone care about it?

The CHI Conference specifies the need for a tight contribution and benfits statement.

This is connected to the NSF merit review criteria of Broader Impact, and Intellectual Merit.

Prior Work Analysis [1-2 pages]

Write a thorough and incisive description of the relevant prior work. The prior work collection is an essential component of research and invention. It involves collecting published materials that are relevant to the innovation at hand. There are three kinds of prior work: needs, resources, and precedents. Needs are preexisting conditions that drive the process of innovation. They motivate the relevance of the innovation, answering the question, "Why is this important?" These include stories and statistics about citizen behavior, interview data, and projections about future conditions. Resources are ingredients and raw materials that will be used for constructing the new invention. These include enabling technologies, design methods, processes, and materials. Precedents are points of departure. They are prior methods, systems, and services that are similar to the innovation at hand. Enumeration of precedents, with comparative analysis, serves as a basis for differentiating the new invention from what has been done before.

When you cite prior research make sure to be clear and explicit in describing what in particular is relevant about that work, and how you will apply it in your project.

This is interdisciplinary research, so include relevant research from HCI, multimedia, hypertext, cognitive psychology, graphics, etc (the sciences), and any relevant design and art citations. Use Google, Google Scholar, the ACM Digital Library, CiteSeer, Leonardo Electronic Almanac, Rhizome and TAMU LibCat, as well as the papers already on our reading list. Pay special attention to the last several years of proceedings form whatever conference you plan to submit to.

When you find a relevant article, use it to find others through citation chaining. Backward chaining investigate papers cited by an article, while forward chaining considers papers that cite the article.

Create a bibliography, with the entries alphabetized and formatted properly.

Evaluation Plan [1 page]

How will we know if your project is sucessful? The goal of evaluation is to establish (prove!?) that you have accomplished what you intended to. Design experiments and qualitative studies that will establish this. As you have build your project, you will conduct these studies as part of the project cycle.

Project Plan [1 page]

How will you develop the project? Consider both the prototype time period, and the longer term. What software and hardware technologies are involved? What algorithmic methods? What functional modules do you envision? How will they interconnect? What is the system's architecture? What needs to be developed to conduct the evaluation?

Make sure to factor in iterative design. Plan to make lighter-weight prototypes earlier, and more functional ones later. What will the role of formative evaluation be? How will your project evolve? Your plan must consider and account for this.

What will be done by whom, when? What roles is each person playing in the project? What are the milestones and deliverables that each person will be responsible for? When? Include something like a GANT chart. Be very specific in defining each step.

Scenarios [1 page]

Develop scenarios for how your applciation/device will be used. These are informal stories, which include hypothetical characters, who may have well-defined differentiated backgrounds. Interview potential users as necessary to help you deveop these.

Abstract [1-2 paragraphs]

A tight decription of your project. Includes
This is sort of, but not exactly a summary of your paper. It is also an expansion of the contribution statement.


due thursday, 3/6 (initial)

tuesday 3/17
(refined - with scenarios, abstract, and response to feedback)
designed for mozilla 1+ and ie 6+
an interface ecology lab production